Sunday, March 2, 2008

Changing Trends in Telecommuting

Dear classmates,
I read this interesting article in WSJ so I would like to share it with you. The article talks about decrease in telecommuting trends and restructure in existing ones because the research that shows better performance of those working in companies headquarters.
Here is the article:

Some Companies Rethink
The Telecommuting Trend

The call came toward the end of my hour as a recent guest on a Minnesota Public Radio talk show. "Jim from Minneapolis" said he and many of his telecommuting colleagues were being called back to the office.

After years of working productively from home, Jim said he was surprised and disappointed.

Although working from home has been expanding steadily, some chinks are appearing in the trend. A few big promoters of home-based and mobile-office work arrangements, including AT&T, Intel, Hewlett-Packard and parts of the federal government, have called some home-based workers back to the office, causing some to quit. The callbacks are small and don't reflect a full retrenchment, but the factors at work -- a push to consolidate operations, and the notion that teamwork improves when people work face-to-face -- suggest other employers might follow suit as recession clouds loom.

MAILBOX



Sue Shellenbarger answers questions on contacting employers ahead of a move, and careers for those with a criminal record.AT&T called an unspecified number of its 5,000 to 6,000 telecommuters back to the office late last year as part of a consolidation of operations, a spokesman says. SBC Communications, which acquired AT&T and BellSouth, among other companies, and took the AT&T name, now has a national network of offices, making telecommuting unnecessary, he says. Also, some managers wanted to bring workers together to reorganize their work and build new teams quickly.

Intel recently began requiring many telecommuters in its information-technology group to report to the office at least four days a week. Full-time home-office workers now make up 1% to 2% of Intel's 5,500 information-technology workers, down from less than 4%, a spokeswoman says; managers wanted "to keep the team spirit strong, which requires face-to-face interaction, impromptu dialogues, collaboration and mentoring," she explains.

Hewlett-Packard, the company that invented flextime, called a significant number of home-office information-technology workers back to the office in 2006, during a consolidation of its 85 data centers into six.

And the federal government, also a big promoter, posted a 7.3% drop in telecommuters from 2005 to 2006, partly because of a callback by the Interior Department. Paul Hoffman, a deputy assistant secretary for the department, cites some managers' security worries about the potential theft of laptops with sensitive data, or hackers intruding on remote users' wireless networks.


All these employers insist they still fully support telecommuting. And U.S. corporate employees working full time from home are still rising, gaining 30% since 2005 to 2.44 million in 2007, says Ray Boggs, a research vice president with IDC, a Framingham, Mass., market-research concern. Nortel, JetBlue and others employers are expanding work-at-home.

But if these bellwether employers can call telecommuters back to the office, any company can. Telecommuters are easy to fire or relocate. Andrea Meyers had been working successfully from home for three years when her small employer laid off all of its 30 telecommuters with no explanation. It may be easier to sever people working from home, she says, because they're "not visible." Although she understood the move, "It was a shock," says Ms. Meyers, a specialist in online learning systems.

Some tips on keeping a work-at-home gig:

4 comments:

Michael Shear said...

I have been working on the need to find more effective uses of telecommunications technologies to support remote workers and have concluded that the work from home model does not work enough of the time for enough individuals. This approach is also inappropriately seen as a viable method of supporting continuity of operations planning. This will be proven to be based upon several false assumtions. A more effective method of supporting knowledge workers remotely is the development of public-private networks of secure facilities. The predominant ’single location model’ in use by most major organizations is a remnant from our industrial age experience. Multi-location workforce deployment will be a cornerstone for connecting our communities in the information economy. Aside from better traffic congestion mitigation, pro-active deployment from secure network facilities greatly improves emergency preparedness. The list of drivers to move beyond work from home and hotelling is growing daily. Distributed workplace must be given an oportunity to demonstrate the tremendous potential of our information and communication technologies resources.

Anonymous said...

Yeah yeah, whatever. Is this article come from the editorial section? Whether it is or not, it really does not matters. Telecommuting only works for some job in some situation, and it does not works for some job in some situation. The job is depends on the job duty, people involvement, employer's objective, employer's financial situation, financial goal, market environment, the economy, and many other factors. That is my little comment.

Anonymous said...

Thank you for sharing though.

Lidija Stupar said...

Dear "Blogger", the article is from the Wall Street Journal as I wrote. If you read the article carefully you would learn something from it and you would realize that your "little comment", as you correctly call it is unnecessary.